More private homes investigated for flouting minimum stay law

Keshia Faculin27 Nov 2017

The number of private residential properties investigated by Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) for breaching the minimum stay law has risen from 1,000 between 2014 and 2016, or an average of around 330 properties per year, to 600 from January to September this year, reported Channel News Asia.

Attributing the increase partly to “heightened public awareness of the regulations in place”, a URA spokesperson revealed that majority of the offences took place in condominiums.

To protect the “living environment of neighbouring residents”, URA has set the minimum rental period for private residential properties in Singapore to three months, which means typical short-term letting on platforms such as Airbnb is prohibited.

According to the spokesperson, URA is informed of potential violations either through feedback received from affected neighbours or a condominium’s managing agent or management corporation.

“All feedback will be investigated and URA works closely with the managing agents and management corporations on the investigations.”

URA, however, noted that most of the offenders have complied upon being served with enforcement notices, eliminating the need for further action.

“In considering the appropriate enforcement action to be taken, URA will take into account the specific circumstances of each case,” said the spokesperson.

“If the offenders are recalcitrant or fail to comply with our requirements following enforcement actions, they are liable to be charged in court.”

Notably, it is an offence to convert a residential property’s use for short-term accommodation without the approval of the URA under the Planning Act. Persons found to be violating the rules may be imprisoned for up to 12 months and/or fined up to $200,000.


This article was edited by Keshia Faculin.

Jack Chua
Nov 27, 2017
The above article is about flouting the rules on "Minimum stay of 3 months". What about another URA rule that states that a 3 room HDB Flat can house a maximum of 6 people ( not family) and a 10 big rooms Mansion can also house a maximum of only 6 people ( not family ), just recently reduced from 8 people last time. I am just curious whether there is a Discrepancy somewhere in the Law. I rang up to URA Enquiry, and the girl who answered the phone said that the Law is the Law, there is nothing much they can do about it. When asked what am I supposed to do with the other 4 huge rooms, she told me " just lock them up !!! " In LAND SCARCE SINGAPORE ??? I hope the authorities can enlighten me on this Law. I know that the Penalty for flouting this Law is also 12 months imprisonment and/or $ 200,000.00 fine. Jack Chua.

You may also like these articles

Woman arrested for suspected rental scams

If convicted, she faces a jail term of up to 10 years and a fine. The police have arrested a 41-year-old woman for suspected involvement in several rental scam cases, reported Channel NewsAsia.

Continue Reading27 Oct 2016

HDB changes rental rules for work permit holders

Non-Malaysian work permit holders from the manufacturing sector are no longer allowed to rent a whole Housing Board flat as of 1st January 2017, and instead, only allowed to rent rooms. However,

Continue Reading24 Jan 2017

Condos pass by-laws to curb short-term rentals

The government is considering creating a new building-use category for private homes whose owners wish to offer their property for short-term rent.  In light of the growing number of homes offered

Continue Reading8 Feb 2017